Friday, November 10, 2006

Birthday Wish

26 today!  Dyslexia?  Me?  My wish is that the world will be a better place a year from now...and I helped!  I also hope my website will be a better place too: http://sobehealthy.com 

Monday, September 11, 2006

Discussion with an "expert"

I received an IM from a west coast university researcher.

Since he calls himself an “expert” I am not correcting his spelling.  Only his name has been changed to avoid violating AOL terms of service.

   

 A Researcher [4:58 P.M.]:  unfortunately, AIDS is NOT over, or even close to being over. simply because the infection rate has remained unchanged, there arre still 40,000 new infection occuring each and every year. if you were one of the 40,000, your perspective would most likely and immediately change.
Auto response from AIDSisOver [4:58 P.M.]: I am away from my computer right now.  Send me an e-mail and we'll talk later.  If you haven't already done so, read my blog.  Diary of an AIDS Dissident    AIDS is 100% curable.   If you don't believe it, would you like to make a bet?  NEXT HEAL MEETING: Sept. 27th.  7:45, 18 e. 23rd.  Meet author Celia Farber!
A Researcher [5:00 P.M.]:  and, AIDS is in no way curable, especially for those who continue to die each year in th <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />US.
AIDSisOver [5:07 P.M.]:  I'm back. 40,000 (mostly victims of invalid testing) is hardly an epidemic.  This number has been more or less constant for well over a decade, yet new AIDS cases continue to decline.  13,000 last year for the US.  275 for Canada.  You might want to do a little research:  AIDS Wiki - AIDS Wiki

A Researcher [5:11 P.M.]:  Unfortunately, this is an old agruement that holds no water. We arre all free to believe whatever we wish to, but your perception is simply misinformed and it could be considered dangerous to uninformed individuals who might like what you are promoting, but it is simply untrue and incorrect. 40,000 new infections each years have passed the 1 million mark of US infections. While some are living longer, it is not true that there is a cure to HIV.  Sorry, but your perception is entirely with out merit.
AIDSisOver [5:12 P.M.]:  I'm heading out for the evening right now, but would like to hear back from you after you'd had a chance to examine outside your comfort zone -- if you have the balls.

A Researcher [5:16 P.M.]:  This issue is in no way a portion of my comfort zone. I am using scientifically adopted facts. I also am an expert in the field, and I do speak out when I see individuals like yourself distributing information which is counter to accepted knowledge.  Your arguement is nearly 20 years old, and simply NOT true. Peace

 

REPLY (Sent later by email)

 

Hello? What argument do you speak of? The argument that "AIDS" is dying out, is only 12 years old, and can be verified by looking at the annual numbers.  The argument that there were only 13,000 new diagnosed people last year is only one year old.  So what are you talking about, Mr. Expert?  And since when are facts scientifically adopted?  When I went to school facts were scientifically proven.  That's why I loved science and math.  You could prove your work and walk out knowing you maxed an exam.

 

It was accepted knowledge that the Earth was flat and the sun went around it, too.  And the true argument, that the Earth was round and went around the sun, was hundreds of years old before it was accepted by everyone.  There were many generations of flat earthers.

 

The 40,000 Americans labeled with HIV each year are not new infections.  They are the victims of an invalid test.  Most are not sick.  Since 1993 most new US AIDS victims aren't ill either.  They are being misdiagnosed based on having an antibody, which is a healthy thing to have, and having “low” t-cells, which can also be found in healthy people.

 

And why has it taken over a quarter century to reach the million cumulative total?  We were told there were over 1 million "infected" Americans when they first started testing the blood supply in the mid-80's and the predictions were for millions of dead bodies on the streets of America by 1995!  A total of a million victims over a period of almost 30 years is hardly an epidemic.  In the same timeframe over 30 million have died of cardiovascular disease and 15 million from cancer.  But unlike heart disease and cancer, which are holding strong, AIDS, in the US is dying out.  Look at the numbers:  (You might have to click on the graph above to enlarge it to read it clearly.)

 

These were the figures reported in 2000 CDC AIDS Surveillance Report.  They end in 1999.  By my calculations, the epidemic should already be over.  New cases down to zero.  No one at the CDC seems to want to release actual figures anymore.  Maybe, as an expert, you can help me find the missing numbers for 2000 to the present.  I'd like to update my chart.

 

NOTICE:  Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency
may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do
this  without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse
nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current administration.
 

Sunday, September 10, 2006

This says it all!

The graph you see here was on my AOL home page from 2000 until 2005 when the entire site was deleted without cause.  The numbers came from the CDC's annual AIDS Surveillance Report.  The blue line shows new "AIDS" diagnoses by year.  The pink line show's "AIDS" deaths.  They have both declined dramatically since their peak, over a decade ago. 

In trying to reconstruct and update this graph, I've come across an unusual obstacle.  It seems the CDC stopped reporting annual numbers after 2000.  I was able to find some numbers for new diagnoses from the Kaiser Foundation, but they made it clear that all of the numbers from the year 2000 and up were estimates.  From my estimation they were exaggerations as they showed an unexplained rise to the 1996-1997 level and then holding strong.  "AIDS" death numbers remain a mystery, although a screaming Mimi who claims he works for the CDC, exclaimed there were 13,000 in the US last year!  Three to four times as many die from the flu.  Bedsores kill 5 times as many people!  Why aren't we pouring $100 billion into the bedsore pandemic?  What does the President's office on bedsores have to say about this?

"AIDS" in the US is over.  Beware the coming vaccine to take credit for this.  You'd better beware, because if you're not already "HIV-positive," you're going to get one.  And before you get yours, you'll have to be tested to make sure you're not already "HIV-positive," in which case you might face mandatory medical "treatment."  I'm not sure what we can do to prevent it, but I think the answer starts with impeachment.  Can you say the word "IMPEACH?"

Friday, September 1, 2006

Talking to the CDC

Today I got an IM from someone who claims to work for the CDC telling me to get my facts straight, but, as you can see for yourself, he didn’t have his facts straight.

 

(His screen name has been changed in order to not violate TOS.)

 

 CDC WORKER [2:12 P.M.]:  I have no I idea where you think you get your information but you are totally wrong get informed or stop spreading your lies and filth


Auto response from AIDSisOver [2:12 P.M.]:

I am away from my computer right now.  Send me an e-mail and we'll talk later.  If you haven't already done so, read my blog.  Diary of an AIDS Dissident    AIDS is 100% curable.   If you don't believe it, would you like to make a bet? 

 

[When I returned, he was still on line:]

 

AIDSisOver [4:25 P.M.]:  Help me out. If something I said is incorrect, I'd like to know what you are referring to and where you get your information.

CDC WORKER [4:26 P.M.]:   AIDS IS FAR FROM OVER IT IS ON THE RISE IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD I WORK FOR THE CDC

AIDSisOver [4:28 P.M.]:  It's not on the rise in the US or Canada, where there were 275 new AIDS cases last year.

CDC WORKER [4:29 P.M.]:  WRONG OVER 13,000 NEW CASES IN THE US ALONE  THIS YEAR
CDC WORKER [4:29 P.M.]:  THE NORTHWEST ALONE HAS  OVER 4000 NEW CASES TO DATE AS OF THIS YR
CDC WORKER [4:30 P.M.]:  GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT

AIDSisOver [4:31 P.M.]:  TURN YOUR CAP LOCKS OFF AND MAYBE WE CAN TALK ABOUT IT.

CDC WORKER [4:31 P.M.]:  DON'T NEED TO
CDC WORKER [4:32 P.M.]:  JUST GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT

AIDSisOver [4:32 P.M.]:  13,000 new cases in a country of 300 million is no epidemic.  Doctors kill 20 times that in a year.

CDC WORKER [4:32 P.M.]:  NOT TO AIDS THEY DON'T NOT IN THIS COUNTRY
AIDSisOver [4:33 P.M.]:  There are less new cases every year since 1994.  It is dying out here and in Canada, Germany and other 1st world nations.

CDC WORKER [4:33 P.M.]:  YOU SPOUT YOUR PROPAGANDA AND ANYONE WHO KNOWS NOTHING MIGHT LISTEN TO YOU AND YOU ARE THE REAL KILLER

AIDSisOver [4:33 P.M.]:  And what it going on in Africa is totally unrelated to what is called "AIDS" in the US.

CDC WORKER [4:34 P.M.]:  NO IT'S NOT AIDS IS EPIDEMIC WORLD WIDE
CDC WORKER [4:35 P.M.]:  I have wasted enough of my time talking to you  have a good day and  get truly educated

 

 

[This was the first time I saw the number 13,000 for the annual new cases, as it seems the CDC stopped giving numbers in 2000.  I really wanted more info on the numbers and wrote to this person….]

 

Oscar,

If you work for the CDC, perhaps you can help me educate myself.  I need some figures that you seem to have that I haven't been able to get anywhere else.

Ed

 

To which I received the following when I attempted to send the message:

 

The following problems occurred while processing your request:

 

CDC WORKER - This member is currently not accepting e-mail from your account.

 

Your mail has not been sent.  Please correct the problems listed and try again.

 

Sunday, August 6, 2006

Q: Has anyone been able to eliminate HIV antibodies and pass a test after

Today someone asks,

"Has anyone been able to eliminate HIV antibodies and pass a test after having failed one?"

A: Well, technically if you've come up positive for antibodies you've passed the test, not failed it.  Antibodies are supposedly good things to have, not bad, but AIDSthink and AIDSspeak have so confounded our thinking that confusion on the matter is to be expected.
 
There have been some people who test negative after testing positive.  But so what?  Don't you know the Catch-22 of AIDS? If you subsequently test negative after being labeled "HIV-positive," that means your immune system is too weak to even make antibodies anymore.
 
Stop wasting your time, blood, money and worry on an invalid test and giving it any credence by continuing to participate in the ruse.  As long as you continue to believe in the test and the doctors who administer it, you are a victim and you are in trouble.  The testing has been demonstrated to be worthless.  The test should be outlawed and the quacks who administer it and prescribe treatments based on it should be arrested and charged with terrorism and genocide!
 
Q: Is there a method for converting a positive result to a negative HIV result?  Hulda Regehr Clark claims she has had patients be cured.
 
A:  It seems you answered your own question.  I would add to Dr. Clark's advice: Be white, heterosexual, and in no risk group when you go for this test. 
 
Q: Do you know anyone who has tried the Hulda Regehr Clark method? 

A:  Can't say that I do, but then again I don't believe in cures.  I believe in getting out from under the curse.  The cure for a lie is truth.  The human body is amazing adept at healing itself if we can just manage to stay out of its way.

Q: Do you know anyone who has gone from positive to Negative?


A: Several people have told me they have. I didn't ask to see their papers.  I think it's more important that we stop giving this test any credence and everyone should be HIV anonymous!

Monday, July 24, 2006

a brainwashed young man from queens writes:

In a message dated 7/24/2006 10:24:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Brainwashed writes:
stop telling people aids is over when it greater than ever
Not in this country.  It has been steadily dying out since 1993.  As an epidemic, it is over.  More people die of bed sores.  More people die from the flu.  Look up the numbers for yourself.
 
AIDS is also over for intelligent people who have researched beyond the politically correct propaganda and have seen the truth and no longer believe in the virus or the governmedical machine that promotes fear and pharmaceuticals.
 
Unfortunately it isn't over for those who believe in the virus and have faith in their doctors.  But for those with the intelligence to question and scrutinize, AIDS is clearly over.  And that's who I'm here for -- the intelligent minority.  If that's not you, feel free to ignore me, but, please don't tell me what to say or not say. 
 
I'm almost finished with Celia Farber's new book, "Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS."  I highly recommend it. 

Sunday, July 2, 2006

Are Condoms Safe?

How safe are condoms? Are they really "safer sex?"


If AIDS is not the infectious epidemic we've been systematically programmed to fear, as more and more highly regarded experts in every field are saying, then condoms and the whole idea of preventing HIV infection by preventing contact with sperm have nothing to do with ending AIDS.

If AIDS is multifactorial disease, as careful scientific examination strongly supports, could the false sense of security condoms create lead to more behavior that is ultimately detrimental to the health of the individual? (More recreational sex and use of recreational drugs that goes hand-in-hand with recreational sex, as well as the documented toxicity of the latex and synthetic lubricants, and physical tissue damage from added friction and lessened sensitivity.)  We know now that the spermicide nonoxynol-9, that was falsely touted preventing HIV transmission, was a total disaster.  Sadly, some people knew for more than a decade while this horrid stuff was being pushed on to the risk groups.

Anyway, the good news is Rethinkers from all over the world got together recently in NYC and there was a sense of renewed purpose and hope for a real breakthrough very soon.