Diary of an AIDS Dissident

about me

2008-10-18T01:09:00.000-07:00

CLICK THE LINK TO JOIN OUR DISCUSSION GROUP!

HIV_Does_Not_Cause_AIDS

In 1987, mindlessly giving in to peer pressure, I first tested for "HIV," knowing I couldn't have it, having had no risky behavior in over six years at the time and we were told the virus killed you in less time than that. Plus, I hadn't even suffered a cold in the 8 years since I got turned on to the exercise that boosts the immune system, and after respiratory problems having been my nemisis for the first 36 years of my life!

Imagine the shock when told I was "positive" and would die in 2-3 years without early medical intervention -- which could extend my life a year, by which time we'd have a cure -- and not to worry if I couldn't afford it; they'd get me into a study group!

No way! I'd already lost 100 friends to AIDS. All had had faith in their doctors. But the handful of friends I'd turned on to the immune boosting exercise I'd been doing since1980 were doing perfectly fine with no medical intervention whatsoever. Even my ex-, who had almost died from the medications, recovered when he went off them. Now that I, too, was told I had the virus, I thought for sure I'd discovered the cure for HIV/AIDS!

an open letter to Michael Moore

2007-07-17T12:58:00.000-07:00

I finally saw sicko and it earned my top rating: 0 Z's. I rate my movies by Z's. Every time I nod out during a movie, it earns a Z. The lower the score, the better the flick.

I loved every frame of this movie, from the opening vignettes to very end of the closing titles, which I'm glad I stayed for. It made me smile. It made me laugh. It made me cry. It made me think. It showed me things that have improved my understanding. But I did not agree with the basic premise. I wrote Mr. Moore today in response to an email from him about 300 Americas dying this week because they were uninsured.

---------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Moore,

300 may have died from not having so-called "health" insurance, but probably ten times as many died from unnecessary medical treatments because they had insurance. The medical-pharmaceutical industry is the number one cause of death, disease, disfigurement and depression. They are destroying health. Medical science does not always follow scientific method. (Prime example: AIDS) It is a pseudo science. It is a religion masquerading as science. As such, all governmedical alliances are unconstitutional. They are not only destroying our health. They are bankrupting our society in the process. Shame on you for doing so much research and not seeing this.

I used to be a fat person like you and a growing number of Americans. We're fat for many reasons, but primarily because of our animal-based diet. Cancer and heart disease, our major killers, are the animals' revenge. Cattle are not only destroying our health, they have recently been shown to be the major cause of global warming -- a very inconvenient truth for cattle farmers like Al Gore. I wish you would look into this.

I saw Sicko and loved almost every minute of it, but you still missed the mark. Yes, the insurance system is corrupt, but the whole medical industry is amiss, doing much more harm than good. I recently watched a DVD called "Eating" (Eating Plus, actually). I highly recommend you watch this, Mr. Moore. It could add many healthy years to your life. And while I don't agree with your conclusions of Sicko, I do believe you are a national treasure and would like to see you stick around this planet for a long time to come.

Sincerely,

Edward Lieb

Tags: sicko, michael moore, ama, health, medicine

questions & comments from a new rebounder customer

2007-06-02T19:25:00.000-07:00

As I haven't blogged much lately, I thought I'd share some interesting correspondance and my reply: [Bracketed comments are mine.]

Hi Ed-

I just wanted to check in with you regarding my rebounding. I really like
the workout, but overdid it initially and had some pretty strong cleansing
reactions. I backed off and am adding a minute or so per day-am doing
about 15 minutes twice per day. My lymph nodes have gone down and my
lower back feels much better. I also noticed that another fingernail is
normalizing from red to light coloration, something that I thought was
parasites-one of the books mentioned "trapped blood proteins" which may be
another explanation. I was actually gearing up to plunge into yoga and
meditation, but this is much more fun and less work/control.

The video [the Immune System DVD that is included free with the rebounder] was excellent. I have a background in biology so it was not
difficult to understand it. The footage of cellular functions was great;
it is always good to visualize cellular dynamics to understand an obscure
concept. When the DVD started and mentioned "cell food" I thought it was
going to be an infomercial regarding glyconutrients, but was pleased that
there was nothing for sale. I am curious though, what nutrient
supplementation that you use, if you don't mind sharing.

Regards,
Brian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian,
Thank you so much for the feedback. Are you starting and ending every rebound session with 3 to 5 minutes of the gentle health bounce? When I redo my website I want to add letters like yours to show people how amazing rebound exercise really is.

Glad you liked the video. You don't need a science background to understand it. That's the true beauty of it. Carter's healthy cell concept is so simple and makes so much sense. When it comes to nutrition, he didn't know as much as we know now when he made the original tape, circa 1988. Glad you asked about supplements, Carter was pushing Km at the time,but that was edited out of the DVD. I take no supplements. One of the things I learned from 20+ years of observations of what other people were doing wrong, is that more often than not, the pills, powders and potions people take in their quest for health, generally interfere with it. I think a lot of people need to have something exotic and expensive to believe in. When these things work well, it is probably due to the placebo effect more than anything else.

I believe there is no better way to get your nutrition than from living plant sources -- locally grown and organic as much as possible. Also, I think distilled water is the best choice. As to specifics, I find if you eat a variety of colors over the course of the year, you get everything you need. Look for foods that appeal to you. Just as with rebounding, listen to your body. Living Nutrition Magazine is probably the best source of information along this line. Most of the other "raw" groups have evolved to selling exotic, overpriced placebos. Another good website: rawfoodinfo.com

Continued success to you. I don't know how old you are, or what kind of shape you're in, but I can tell you I was a fat, unathletic person when I started rebounding in my mid-thirties. I look and feel so much better now, in my sixties, and as far as I can tell, it's still getting better with time! We've not only been misled all our lives about health and disease, but also about aging.

Ed

Tags: rebound, lymph nodes,

on testing and boycotting blood donation

2007-01-29T08:35:00.000-08:00

The average person's greatest risk of ending up an AIDS victim comes from taking the test! The testing has been shown to be invalid, but the results of being told one has failed this invalid test can be lethal. The testing should be outlawed. Whatever this test is actually detecting, if indeed one unique entity at all, it does not appear to be a threat to anyone. Maybe that is why the CDC stopped publishing surveillance data in 1999.

The testing must be stopped. Right now everyone who donates blood is getting tested whether he knows it or not. You put yourself at risk of becoming an AIDS victim everytime you donate blood. People worry that a boycott on blood donations would cost lives, but the truth is, it would cause a marked decrease in unnecessary surgeries and other medical procedures and death rates drop.

Tags: cdc, blood, donors aids hiv test

can u believe this musclehead who calls himself a writer?

2007-01-22T07:02:00.000-08:00

Just thought I'd share a gem from my e-mail to illustrate what we're up against.

Subject:

(no subject)

Date:

1/22/2007 7:24:56 A.M. Eastern Standard Time

From:

Muscle...

Reply To:
To:	AIDSisOver

You are completely insane are or misinformed. AIDS is very much in epidemic form worldwide - Africa, Asia. Time to re-check your completely inaccurate statistics - as it is currently spiking up here in the US as well, thanks to wide spread crystal meth use. Wait a few short years and see. If it seems under control in your view, well that is only because medicines have become - for the time being - highly effective. This is no time to walk way or ignore the possibilities of the future. Aids HAS NOT been cured. AIDS is NOT OVER - not by a long shot. It is only by keeping it in the forefront - constantly - they we even stand a ghost of a chance of wiping it out for the future. A mind such as yours sounds highly dangerous for the future of medicine. And your having a screen name proclaiming AIDSISOVER???? Don't you have anything more productive to do with your time? Or at least honest?

to which I replied:

The misinformed one here is you, my friend, along with most of the world who are brainwashed with propaganda and don't have the common sense to question things that don't make sense and examine the evidence with scientific scrutiny. Believe me, I am not insane, although having an IQ that puts me in the top 1% of the world is not exactly normal.

The medications are not responsible for the decline of AIDS. The people who are living the longest and the best don't take them. The decline started before the miracle drugs came out. AIDS in Africa has nothing to do with HIV or what is called AIDS in America. There are several documentaries and thousands of web pages online, as well as many books exposing the HIV/AIDS hoax, as it coming to be recognized. You can get a decent overview by reading the online reviews and excerpts from VirusMyth AIDS WebSite - Book Section

Before you start your name-calling and get your tits in an uproar, you need to open your eyes and your mind and do a little research.

Then I received the following:

Subject:

(no subject)

Date:

1/22/2007 8:19:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time

From:

MuscleRomanceNYC

Reply To:
To:

You are indeed EXTREMELY misinformed and as I said before, probably insane - oh, and as a person who knows A GREAT deal of where I speak (unlike yourself, who is refering to online information, which is widely know for being inaccuate, particularly in relation to anything medical as online publications, blogs, re-prints, statistics, etc. are not required to be fact checked as most other periodicals are and therfore deemed mostly unreliable) - in addition I might add you couldn't possibly have a high IQ, not with the false information you spread like fowl manure for no apparant reason. There is no brainwashing or propaganda going on here. Just your mentioning that suggests a strange and unsettling paranoia that so often goes hand in hand with people who bring up the very notions of "brainwashing" and "progaganda" in the first place - perhaps too many bad movies and TV shows. The medications are indeed responsible for the decline of AIDS - not HIV mind you, which is GROWING, just the disease, the illness, we have come to refer to as AIDS - a fact you might want to get right from the get go. The decline in AIDS DID NOT start before the good, latest drugs came out (they are not "miracle" drugs) and people who have shyed from them have NOT lived the best and longest - quite the opposite. Ever speak in large numbers with, observe or know people infected who have taken the drugs for many years vs. those who did not? Apparantly not. Consult any HIV/aids specialists, doctors on this issue? You could not have or you would know better. The ones who refused the drugs are either gone or doing very poorly. Fiinally, there is no "AIDS HOAX" as you say. Would be so great if actually that were true. You need to get educated, informed - for real. Check out the more recent editions of The New England Journal of Medicine, The Center For Disease Control, The Pasteur Institute. A warped mind is a terrible thing to unleash on the public. Lucky for you, I suppose, there is a thing called AOL.

But what I really don't understand and find so deeply disturbing - is that you would take the time to create a sceen name, profile, etc. just to express untruths - dangerous untruths - that serve no purpose whatsoever. What is actually behind such a scary and ridiculous tirade anyway?

to which I replied:

"what medications are you on?"

I really didn't expect to hear from him again, but....

received this:

Wow, smart comeback. That high IQ of yours is real evident. I'm on 2 medicines for HIV actually - and YOU?????

I guess that explains things a little.

A great book -- definitely worth reading

2007-01-03T13:39:00.000-08:00

I recently read a great book that I recommend highly. Unlike most of my "AIDS" library, this one is a work of fiction. It's the fictitious tale of what would be the largest class action suit in history -- a suit for $3 trillion on behalf of the 300,000 gay men who were killed by AZT from 1987 to 1997. While the story is fiction, the facts presented in the trial are real and are documented in the book. This is a real page turner. I had a hard time putting it down. You probably won't find this book in a book store or public library, but you can order it an any bookstore, or from Amazon, but you'll save money and help HEAL if you go to HEALAIDS.COM and follow the ordering instructions there. The books is called "Wrongful Death: The AIDS Trial," by Stephen Davis.

You can read or listen to several chapters on line. Check it out now, and perhaps add some comments here after you've read it.

Tags: Wrongful Death, The AIDS Trial, Class action, book, nude, beach

Birthday Wish

2006-11-10T10:12:00.000-08:00

26 today! Dyslexia? Me? My wish is that the world will be a better place a year from now...and I helped! I also hope my website will be a better place too: http://sobehealthy.com

Discussion with an "expert"

2006-09-11T17:01:00.000-07:00

I received an IM from a west coast university researcher.

Since he calls himself an “expert” I am not correcting his spelling. Only his name has been changed to avoid violating AOL terms of service.

A Researcher [4:58 P.M.]: unfortunately, AIDS is NOT over, or even close to being over. simply because the infection rate has remained unchanged, there arre still 40,000 new infection occuring each and every year. if you were one of the 40,000, your perspective would most likely and immediately change.
Auto response from AIDSisOver [4:58 P.M.]: I am away from my computer right now. Send me an e-mail and we'll talk later. If you haven't already done so, read my blog. Diary of an AIDS Dissident AIDS is 100% curable. If you don't believe it, would you like to make a bet? NEXT HEAL MEETING: Sept. 27th. 7:45, 18 e. 23rd. Meet author Celia Farber!
A Researcher [5:00 P.M.]: and, AIDS is in no way curable, especially for those who continue to die each year in th <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />US.
AIDSisOver [5:07 P.M.]: I'm back. 40,000 (mostly victims of invalid testing) is hardly an epidemic. This number has been more or less constant for well over a decade, yet new AIDS cases continue to decline. 13,000 last year for the US. 275 for Canada. You might want to do a little research: AIDS Wiki - AIDS Wiki

A Researcher [5:11 P.M.]: Unfortunately, this is an old agruement that holds no water. We arre all free to believe whatever we wish to, but your perception is simply misinformed and it could be considered dangerous to uninformed individuals who might like what you are promoting, but it is simply untrue and incorrect. 40,000 new infections each years have passed the 1 million mark of US infections. While some are living longer, it is not true that there is a cure to HIV. Sorry, but your perception is entirely with out merit.
AIDSisOver [5:12 P.M.]: I'm heading out for the evening right now, but would like to hear back from you after you'd had a chance to examine outside your comfort zone -- if you have the balls.

A Researcher [5:16 P.M.]: This issue is in no way a portion of my comfort zone. I am using scientifically adopted facts. I also am an expert in the field, and I do speak out when I see individuals like yourself distributing information which is counter to accepted knowledge. Your arguement is nearly 20 years old, and simply NOT true. Peace

REPLY (Sent later by email)

Hello? What argument do you speak of? The argument that "AIDS" is dying out, is only 12 years old, and can be verified by looking at the annual numbers. The argument that there were only 13,000 new diagnosed people last year is only one year old. So what are you talking about, Mr. Expert? And since when are facts scientifically adopted? When I went to school facts were scientifically proven. That's why I loved science and math. You could prove your work and walk out knowing you maxed an exam.

It was accepted knowledge that the Earth was flat and the sun went around it, too. And the true argument, that the Earth was round and went around the sun, was hundreds of years old before it was accepted by everyone. There were many generations of flat earthers.

The 40,000 Americans labeled with HIV each year are not new infections. They are the victims of an invalid test. Most are not sick. Since 1993 most new US AIDS victims aren't ill either. They are being misdiagnosed based on having an antibody, which is a healthy thing to have, and having “low” t-cells, which can also be found in healthy people.

And why has it taken over a quarter century to reach the million cumulative total? We were told there were over 1 million "infected" Americans when they first started testing the blood supply in the mid-80's and the predictions were for millions of dead bodies on the streets of America by 1995! A total of a million victims over a period of almost 30 years is hardly an epidemic. In the same timeframe over 30 million have died of cardiovascular disease and 15 million from cancer. But unlike heart disease and cancer, which are holding strong, AIDS, in the US is dying out. Look at the numbers: (You might have to click on the graph above to enlarge it to read it clearly.)

These were the figures reported in 2000 CDC AIDS Surveillance Report. They end in 1999. By my calculations, the epidemic should already be over. New cases down to zero. No one at the CDC seems to want to release actual figures anymore. Maybe, as an expert, you can help me find the missing numbers for 2000 to the present. I'd like to update my chart.

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency
may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do
this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse
nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current administration.

This says it all!

2006-09-10T15:27:00.000-07:00

The graph you see here was on my AOL home page from 2000 until 2005 when the entire site was deleted without cause. The numbers came from the CDC's annual AIDS Surveillance Report. The blue line shows new "AIDS" diagnoses by year. The pink line show's "AIDS" deaths. They have both declined dramatically since their peak, over a decade ago.

In trying to reconstruct and update this graph, I've come across an unusual obstacle. It seems the CDC stopped reporting annual numbers after 2000. I was able to find some numbers for new diagnoses from the Kaiser Foundation, but they made it clear that all of the numbers from the year 2000 and up were estimates. From my estimation they were exaggerations as they showed an unexplained rise to the 1996-1997 level and then holding strong. "AIDS" death numbers remain a mystery, although a screaming Mimi who claims he works for the CDC, exclaimed there were 13,000 in the US last year! Three to four times as many die from the flu. Bedsores kill 5 times as many people! Why aren't we pouring $100 billion into the bedsore pandemic? What does the President's office on bedsores have to say about this?

"AIDS" in the US is over. Beware the coming vaccine to take credit for this. You'd better beware, because if you're not already "HIV-positive," you're going to get one. And before you get yours, you'll have to be tested to make sure you're not already "HIV-positive," in which case you might face mandatory medical "treatment." I'm not sure what we can do to prevent it, but I think the answer starts with impeachment. Can you say the word "IMPEACH?"

Talking to the CDC

2006-09-01T00:00:00.000-07:00

Today I got an IM from someone who claims to work for the CDC telling me to get my facts straight, but, as you can see for yourself, he didn’t have his facts straight.

(His screen name has been changed in order to not violate TOS.)

CDC WORKER [2:12 P.M.]: I have no I idea where you think you get your information but you are totally wrong get informed or stop spreading your lies and filth

Auto response from AIDSisOver [2:12 P.M.]:

I am away from my computer right now. Send me an e-mail and we'll talk later. If you haven't already done so, read my blog. Diary of an AIDS Dissident AIDS is 100% curable. If you don't believe it, would you like to make a bet?

[When I returned, he was still on line:]

AIDSisOver [4:25 P.M.]: Help me out. If something I said is incorrect, I'd like to know what you are referring to and where you get your information.

CDC WORKER [4:26 P.M.]: AIDS IS FAR FROM OVER IT IS ON THE RISE IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD I WORK FOR THE CDC

AIDSisOver [4:28 P.M.]: It's not on the rise in the US or Canada, where there were 275 new AIDS cases last year.

CDC WORKER [4:29 P.M.]: WRONG OVER 13,000 NEW CASES IN THE US ALONE THIS YEAR
CDC WORKER [4:29 P.M.]: THE NORTHWEST ALONE HAS OVER 4000 NEW CASES TO DATE AS OF THIS YR
CDC WORKER [4:30 P.M.]: GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT

AIDSisOver [4:31 P.M.]: TURN YOUR CAP LOCKS OFF AND MAYBE WE CAN TALK ABOUT IT.

CDC WORKER [4:31 P.M.]: DON'T NEED TO
CDC WORKER [4:32 P.M.]: JUST GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT

AIDSisOver [4:32 P.M.]: 13,000 new cases in a country of 300 million is no epidemic. Doctors kill 20 times that in a year.

CDC WORKER [4:32 P.M.]: NOT TO AIDS THEY DON'T NOT IN THIS COUNTRY
AIDSisOver [4:33 P.M.]: There are less new cases every year since 1994. It is dying out here and in Canada, Germany and other 1st world nations.

CDC WORKER [4:33 P.M.]: YOU SPOUT YOUR PROPAGANDA AND ANYONE WHO KNOWS NOTHING MIGHT LISTEN TO YOU AND YOU ARE THE REAL KILLER

AIDSisOver [4:33 P.M.]: And what it going on in Africa is totally unrelated to what is called "AIDS" in the US.

CDC WORKER [4:34 P.M.]: NO IT'S NOT AIDS IS EPIDEMIC WORLD WIDE
CDC WORKER [4:35 P.M.]: I have wasted enough of my time talking to you have a good day and get truly educated

[This was the first time I saw the number 13,000 for the annual new cases, as it seems the CDC stopped giving numbers in 2000. I really wanted more info on the numbers and wrote to this person….]

Oscar,

If you work for the CDC, perhaps you can help me educate myself. I need some figures that you seem to have that I haven't been able to get anywhere else.

To which I received the following when I attempted to send the message:

The following problems occurred while processing your request:

CDC WORKER - This member is currently not accepting e-mail from your account.

Your mail has not been sent. Please correct the problems listed and try again.

Q: Has anyone been able to eliminate HIV antibodies and pass a test after

2006-08-06T09:54:00.000-07:00

Today someone asks,

"Has anyone been able to eliminate HIV antibodies and pass a test after having failed one?"

A: Well, technically if you've come up positive for antibodies you've passed the test, not failed it. Antibodies are supposedly good things to have, not bad, but AIDSthink and AIDSspeak have so confounded our thinking that confusion on the matter is to be expected.

There have been some people who test negative after testing positive. But so what? Don't you know the Catch-22 of AIDS? If you subsequently test negative after being labeled "HIV-positive," that means your immune system is too weak to even make antibodies anymore.

Stop wasting your time, blood, money and worry on an invalid test and giving it any credence by continuing to participate in the ruse. As long as you continue to believe in the test and the doctors who administer it, you are a victim and you are in trouble. The testing has been demonstrated to be worthless. The test should be outlawed and the quacks who administer it and prescribe treatments based on it should be arrested and charged with terrorism and genocide!

Q: Is there a method for converting a positive result to a negative HIV result? Hulda Regehr Clark claims she has had patients be cured.

A: It seems you answered your own question. I would add to Dr. Clark's advice: Be white, heterosexual, and in no risk group when you go for this test.

Q: Do you know anyone who has tried the Hulda Regehr Clark method?

A: Can't say that I do, but then again I don't believe in cures. I believe in getting out from under the curse. The cure for a lie is truth. The human body is amazing adept at healing itself if we can just manage to stay out of its way.

Q: Do you know anyone who has gone from positive to Negative?

A: Several people have told me they have. I didn't ask to see their papers. I think it's more important that we stop giving this test any credence and everyone should be HIV anonymous!

a brainwashed young man from queens writes:

2006-07-24T21:18:00.000-07:00

In a message dated 7/24/2006 10:24:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Brainwashed writes:

stop telling people aids is over when it greater than ever

Not in this country. It has been steadily dying out since 1993. As an epidemic, it is over. More people die of bed sores. More people die from the flu. Look up the numbers for yourself.

AIDS is also over for intelligent people who have researched beyond the politically correct propaganda and have seen the truth and no longer believe in the virus or the governmedical machine that promotes fear and pharmaceuticals.

Unfortunately it isn't over for those who believe in the virus and have faith in their doctors. But for those with the intelligence to question and scrutinize, AIDS is clearly over. And that's who I'm here for -- the intelligent minority. If that's not you, feel free to ignore me, but, please don't tell me what to say or not say.

I'm almost finished with Celia Farber's new book, "Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS." I highly recommend it.

Amazon.com Books: celia farber

Are Condoms Safe?

2006-07-02T13:54:00.000-07:00

How safe are condoms? Are they really "safer sex?"

If AIDS is not the infectious epidemic we've been systematically programmed to fear, as more and more highly regarded experts in every field are saying, then condoms and the whole idea of preventing HIV infection by preventing contact with sperm have nothing to do with ending AIDS.

If AIDS is multifactorial disease, as careful scientific examination strongly supports, could the false sense of security condoms create lead to more behavior that is ultimately detrimental to the health of the individual? (More recreational sex and use of recreational drugs that goes hand-in-hand with recreational sex, as well as the documented toxicity of the latex and synthetic lubricants, and physical tissue damage from added friction and lessened sensitivity.) We know now that the spermicide nonoxynol-9, that was falsely touted preventing HIV transmission, was a total disaster. Sadly, some people knew for more than a decade while this horrid stuff was being pushed on to the risk groups.

Anyway, the good news is Rethinkers from all over the world got together recently in NYC and there was a sense of renewed purpose and hope for a real breakthrough very soon.

How can ALL the EXPERTS be WRONG?

2006-05-09T06:56:00.000-07:00

Majority rules in politics, but not science. Many people find it hard to believe that all the doctors, all the experts, all the government officials can be wrong. I just watched a 2-hour documentary on Google that does a fairly good job of showing how this can be. The film is probably 10 years old, but every point made is still valid. Some of the numbers need updating. AIDS numbers have declined significantly since 1995.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6814491427846073388&q=conspiracy+duration%3Along&pl=true

If you aren't already 100% that HIV/AIDS is an enormous hoax/medical blunder, please watch this documentary. (Just click on the link and wait, it will start playing.)

This is a good link to forward to others.

Why such hatred of the medical community?

2006-04-21T18:56:00.000-07:00

In a message dated 4/21/2006 1:02:28 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Kelly writes:

Hi, I sent an E-Mail to the group but wanted you to see it. It hasn't
been the best of weeks but my questions still stand. I wonder if you
or some of the other members are as frightened as I am. I know you
will say enlightened, but I truly wonder if you have contemplated what
might happen. Death is surely not a given as any study will show, but
to know all of your options is probably not a bad thing and I cannot
quite understand "why such the hate" for the medical community when
some are so clearly trying to help people. I dont know if they will
allow you to see my message or not. Good Evening, Kelly
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelly,

Why such hatred of the medical community? They are a bunch of overpaid, over-rated, bumbling idiots and clowns, who will lie to your face and then shrug their shoulders and grin when you catch them. They are arrogant bastards who won't respond to challenges to their inept theories, but are quick with a venomous voodoo like, "You don't really believe the virus doesn't cause AIDS?"

Dr. Benjamin Rush, MD, personal physician to George Washington, and the only MD to sign the Declaration of Independence, warned us back then that if medical freedom weren't written into the Constitution, that medicine would organize itself into an underground dictatorship that would eventually bring about the Bastille of medical science. He was right on the first part, I hope time proves him totally correct and we see the public rise up against the black magicians and take back their power.
These people took an oath to above all do no harm, but they are a major cause of death in this country, killing about 1000 people a day!

It really isn't science when you look at it with scientific scrutiny. It's a religion. We've all been programmed since birth to turn over the natural health that is our birthright to the trust of these merchants of death and disease.Health insurance is not a birthright, and it is really an oxymoron, because it does not insure your health. It pretty well assures that you will go out in grand medical style as you surrender your life to the whims of medical deities. Think how much money you would have now if all the money that has gone for your medical insurance went into your bank account instead. Read Dr. Robert Mendelson, MD: "Confessions of a Medical Heretic"

"Natural Cures They Don't Want You to Know About" is a best seller and does a great job of deconstructing the awe of medicine. I don't recommend the book, however, because he's selling all kinds of crazy cures that will just confuse most people. To his credit though he does hit upon a couple of the 32 things needed for health though.

Ed

letter from Argentina

2006-04-21T00:59:00.000-07:00

Hi Ed,

I am Juan, from Argentina. If you are in any of the yahoogroups (aidscred or aidssoc), then we "met" as I have sent several emails.

I´ll tell you briefly. I was given my pos result 3 ys ago. A couple of months later I knew about the dissidence. That was great. You can imagine.

After that I had bits and bobs of illness, but nothing too bad. In 2004 my health started to come down until in dec 04 I had to spend 9 days in a clinic for "PCP" (never knew quite what it was, but I spent +3 months without breathing properly). By march 05, recovered from the lungs but still weak and with toxoplasmosis I had no option other than starting to take ARVs.

I still thought like a dissident, and knew I would quit sooner or later.

That came in Jan 06, when I took my last pills, but I´m still not sure if that was for good or if I´ll have to go back to them (I know I shouldn´t).

My problem is that I did fantastic with them, and my negligible 2ry effects were feet problems (swells and night cramps).

One of my doubts, especially when I talk to other people on meds, is how is it that so many people are doing ok (ish) after even as much as 10 years on the meds. I guess this is because I want to make sure that leaving the ARVs is the right decision. I´ve done great with them, recovered from a really bad spell very quickly (a matter of months), and before starting I was in a sorry state, and I saw myself as the perfect example of an AIDS patient, as I had every sign (itches, night sweats, the illnesses, ETC, ETC).

And, just how can it be that this is such a GIGANTIC matrix.

HOw can it be that EVERYONE is wrong. And Galileo or Goebles are not good examples, because this is 2006.

But then again, most of the times I start reading a decent dissident site I am reassured.

Another thing that bothers me is that there is too little new stuff, and what there is is just more blab on the old fact (that Rebecca who wrote "why I quit aids", for example).

Well, your blog I just came accross, I can´t remember how, but it looked cool so I decided to write. I also found myself identified in a way, because you mention "working" and saving lives in chat rooms, giving all the people the needed information. I wanted to do something like that, creating an "aidsbollocks" profile in some of the profile and chat pages, with a bit of a summary and links.

I guess I´m just looking for more views. I´ll sign in to get news from your blog.

Thanks for any comments, Juan

====================================================

Juan,

After you learned about the dissidents, how many of the better dissident books did you read? VirusMyth AIDS WebSite - Book Section I generally recommend that people read at least one book by Dr. Peter Duesberg and one by someone else. (The British authors are my favorites.) My favorite Duesberg book was, "Why We'll Never Win the War on AIDS," co-authored with Bryan Ellison. That book was banned in the US, but you might find copies in Argentina. But before you read any book critical of the AIDS industry, I strongly suggest Dr. Robert Mendelson, MD: "Confessions of a Medical Heretic" so that you might understand how "everyone can be wrong." It's an old book, but it just keeps getting better (and cheaper) with every read. BTW, not everyone is wrong. Have you looked at the credentials of some of the outspoken dissidents? HIV & AIDS - VirusMyth AIDS WebSite - The Group If you want to understand how all the experts can be wrong, follow the money trail. AIDS has cost the US nearly $200 billion so far.

Your dilemma is very common, so Ihope you don't mind my sharing this with my yahoo group, Yahoo! Groups : HIV_Does_Not_Cause_AIDS and my blog. Diary of an AIDS Dissident. You are still in the zone of fear and confusion. The antidote is education. When you understand the string of lies that is the medical construct of AIDS, the choices become crystal clear. When you see how you've been misled and endangered by this "doctor" you've given over your power to, you should get angry -- very angry.

Not knowing your age or prior health history, I'm really not in a position to know what caused your health problems, although I would imagine you were exposed to toxoplasmosis in the hospital. I just went through the most horrible flu/cold, whatever-you-want-to-call-it, I've had in over 25 years. For all I know, had I taken it to a doctor, they might call it pneumonia, and if they knew I was "hiv+," they'd search and search until they found the ubiquitous entity known as pneumocystic carinii and blame that for my illness. But even if I were to accept medical treatment for the pneumonia (which I doubt I would), knowing what I do about the AIDS theory, I would NEVER take drugs based on fighting HIV. The fact that you felt you had no other option is evidence that you never did the homework necessary to educate yourself out of the AIDS zone.

I don't know what your problem is with "too little new stuff," when you haven't touched the surface on the old stuff. The strange thing about truth is that it doesn't go out of date. In any case, you can usually find the newest information at HEAL: Alternative health and aids information and participate in the latest discussions at AIDS Myth Exposed.

When I have health questions I turn to a woman called Anna-Inez, a former radiology nurse who rejected modern medicine for the study of Life Science. Under her guidance, people have restored their bodies to health from just about every condition that doctors call "incurable," including AIDS, MS, cancer and paralysis. Her e-mail address is Hygeia16@hotmail.com.

Good luck to you.

[NOTE: added August 2006] "Serious Adverse Events," by Celia Farber is a MUST READ!

continuation of the 4/16 post

2006-04-16T18:17:00.000-07:00

I'm not sure if this is the same person, but I guess she missed the link.

In a message dated 4/16/2006 3:36:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
just2_2lucky@yahoo.com writes:

I am so confused and your negativity is dis heartening. I am 27
years old, been married since 2003, and I have 5 kids. I have only
done 2 years of college and want to do more. I found oun a couple
weeks ago I am H.I.V. positive. I do not even know my viral load or
cd4 count. I need information and people I can trust. Please help
and tell me the references for your information.
Sincerely,
Lucky
>

Dear Lucky,

I totally agree with you. You are confused, and it's understandable. You've been lied to by the church that you trusted your entire life to and probably your children's. (If you plan on having more children, please check out 101 Reasons Not to Have Your Baby in a Hospital. )

Any negativity was against the industry that is victimizing your family. Unless you're a doctor, or heavily invested in medicine, there is nothing disheartening. The good news is YOU DON'T HAVE A DISEASE! Do you get it?

If you're 27 and have 5 kids why the x%#&*!! are you taking the so-called "HIV test?" Just the fact that you've had pregnancies recently can make you test false positive. You would have to be confused to waste your blood, time or somebody's money on such a test.

You're lucky to have found us this early in the game -- and it is a game. Hopefully you will never know your "viral load" or CD4 count.

You want references? These are some of the thousands who have stood up to sign their names to the growing list of intelligent and respected scientists, journalists, educators and others who have been calling for a public forum for this issue: HIV & AIDS - VirusMyth AIDS WebSite - The Group

Reading the excerpts and reviews of these books will give you a good overview of what many now refer to as the AIDS Scam. VirusMyth AIDS WebSite - Book Section You can navigate through and fromthat website for as many hours, days or weeks that it takes until you understand that were lucky to find us when you did. You should be far from disheartened. If you need to understand how you've been mind-fucked, this site might help: http://healaids.com

If you run out of reading material, just let me know.

When you've done your homework you might want to confront your doctor with why he put you at such risk by giving you a test whose validity is zilch that allows you to be labeled for life? Then again, if you're prone to violence when you realize your person has been so totally violated, you might not.

I welcome your thoughts pro and con.

Ed

Letter from a reader and responses

2006-04-16T18:15:00.000-07:00

I received the following from a new member, but she says "you all," in the subject line so I'm assuming she wants me to share this with the group, which, btw, has been steadily growing lately. Her e-mail is reprinted here, with my reply below. Please feel free to share.

In a message dated 4/13/2006 12:26:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, a new member@yahoo.com writes:

I tested positive two years ago. I was given this nastiness from a
long term hetrosexual partner whom I now believe knew he was
infected. This being devestating news and what I thought would
surely be "the end" I quickly found an Oncologist who watched and
monitered me for over a year before starting me on meds, my viral
load had climbed from 15,000 to over 100,000 and my C-4 count had
dropped to below 500. My current meds are Viread and Truvada taken
daily. My viral load has dropped to undectectable levels and my C-4
count is up to 1,200 plus. My doctor told me that it is not
uncommon to NOT pass the infection to my husband (I got married), he
has tested negative so far but we do not always use a condom. Am I
risking his life by doing this? I am also curious as to why your
web site states the Doctors are all so wrong, I had started to lose
weight, night sweats, generally not feelng well and have really felt
better after the start of meds. I did cut out Hard alcohol and try
to exercise regularly although I have experienced changes in my
muscle tone in my stomach. Does anyone know how to get around this
unpleasant side effect? I am 43 years old and wonder how many
people are out there like me who rely on the advice given to us by
our Doctors but really dont know the long term effects that might
happen down the road. Am I at risk to possibly die within 10 years
after the onsaught of starting medications or will I live to be 80?
The literature and volume of conflicting data is mind boggling and I
continue to be very scared as I try to live my life and raise my
children before DYING YOUNG. Any comments or suggestions? Thanks
and have a happy Holiday.

REPLY:

I have comments and a suggestion that you educate yourself. I'm not sure if you understand what this group is about, but I hope you learn before it is too late.

You have to understand that you have been totally mind-fucked and terribly mislead by the people you trust -- medical doctors, and your friends and family who believe in them too. I would say, "Forgive them for they know not what they do," except that in the position they are in, they have an obligation to know before they experiment on you, and to "above all, do no harm."

The things you are monitoring are all bullshit. Most medical testing is questionable. The results can be misleading and misinterpreted. If you doctor went to medical school, he should know that t-cells are not a marker for immune health. They are a body-initiated response to toxicity. If he didn't understand that from his education and he is an "AIDS" doctor, he should have realized it after reading the Concorde Study, one of the largest and longest AIDS studies ever done which clearly concluded that "T-cells are not a valid surrogate marker for health or disease progression in AIDS," or other major studies which reached the same conclusion.

And the "HIV" test is a joke. If your doctor kept up to date on the science, he would know that the tests were shown to be useless over a decade ago and that he shouldn't be having any of his patients tested or treated based on such (mis)diagnosis.

I beg you to educate yourself and your husband before it is too late for you. Any doctor who would recklessly endanger the health of his patients with open-ended chemotherapy treatments based on a bunch of invalid surrogate markers is a dangerous person to even be near, much less trust your health and your life to. Unfortunately, your doctor is typical, and we live in a country where majority-rule (politics) and corporate profit have overtaken science. Medicine is a religion that most of the country (and maybe the world) believe in. The problem isn't that 40 million Americans are without "health insurance." The real problem is that hundreds of millions have or want it.

The "HIV/AIDS" experts have wasted over $100 billion, 2 decades of research, and ruined millions of lives in their futile search for a cure. Drugs don't cure disease. Maybe that's why so many people are wearing stupid bracelets, and raising money for the various war-on-disease companies. If you're waiting for doctors to end AIDS, you'll die waiting.

If you need a good "dissident" web site to get you started, try www.healaids.com.

E-mail from Greenbarebear and Reply

2006-04-04T00:39:00.000-07:00

Since I haven't been doing too much blogging lately, thought I'd share the follow up to Greenbarebear, who wrote:

Well, for your information, I am one those people who contracted the virus in the 80's and have been on meds and done everything my doctor has said and I am still going strong. You didn't answer my question about if you were a doctor or not and if you were, are you willing to bet your malpractice insurance on it? For you to prey on people before they have all the information they need to make an informed decision is very irresponsible of you and your friends. I know of a lot of people who have contracted the virus in the 80's and on meds and are still going strong thanks to their doctors support. It is every individual's right to receive the best care and advice before deciding what to do about the treatment they decide on. You and your friend's advice prey on these unsuspecting people and drive them away from potentially life saving medicine's.

I would hate to have to live with your guilty conscience.

Frank G

Believe me, Frank, I have no problem with my conscience. A lot of very wonderful people love me and think of me as their angel. If I WEREN'T sharing this information I would have a problem with my conscience.

If what you say is true, you are very lucky, and a rare case. How many patients has your doctor buried since the 80's?

If I were a doctor, Frank, I would not admit it. I would hang my head in shame and probably kill myself. Despite their oath to "above all, do no harm," they are the #1 cause of disease and death in the U.S. They admit to being #3 (JAMA, August 2004), but their critics say otherwise. I suppose we could compromise and say they are the #2 cause of death. Whether #1, #2, or #3, they are, above all, doing a lot of harm.

Besides destroying our health, they are destroying us financially. Medical expenses are the #1 cause of personal bankruptcies. Andmedical care is the #1 expense of the federal government -- unless Bush has managed to make war the new #1. And health insurance has become the driving force behind the recent municipal transit workers' strikes that have crippled major cities. Medical care is driving up the price of everything else.

You are alive despite the meds. Possibly for a number of factors. First off, you weigh 200 lb. Unlike many prescription drugs, HIV med dosages are not based on body weight. A 98 lb. cha-cha queen would be given the same dosage as you or a Magic Johnson. I don't know your lifestyle, but most of the people who've survived as long on the medications usually work out or do something vigorous on a daily basis. Another factor is your faith.

So you say you know a lot of people who believe they contracted the virus in 80's and are "going strong" -- whatever that means. Most times people tell me that, they are referring to numbers that represent invalid surrogate markers, but in reality they suffer all kinds of health problems. How many people is a lot? According to the government's own figures there are at least a couple of hundred thousand who've been poz since 1984, but still don't it. Obviously they're still going strong with NO medical intervention and no drama.

I'm not preying on anyone and I do want people to have ALL the information so that they can informed choices and not stupid, uninformed and misinformed choices, as you have.

That's what blogs are for.

2006-02-01T19:09:00.000-08:00

I received the following e-mail from HngVersatile@aol.com. When I tried to reply, I discovered, like many close-minded individuals, he had my e-mail blocked. So I shall post my reply here. That's what blogs are for.

In a message dated 2/1/2006 1:54:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, HngVersatile writes:

You would think after some of the most prominent AIDS dissidents died of the very thing they said did not exist that people like you would be embarrassed to keep spouting the same line of crap. Go ask David Pasquarelli if he feels better knowing that his unwillingness to consider HIV meds even as he was dying got him absolutely no where but in a grave.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

My reply:

Almost all of the dissidents I've known, for the past two decades are still here. The most prominent ones I knew who died, died of suicide. Most of the guys I've known going to doctors to treat their virus died, are dying, or look like hell. There is a wide diversity amongst dissidents and amongst everyone else. Some people call themselves dissidents because they don't believe in the medical treatment, but some are still confused on the virus issue. He and his friends came to a HEAL meeting here in NY once, but I never had anything to do with David Pasquarelli.

I may have been spouting the same line for a long time, but that's the way truth is. I am certainly not embarrassed for anything I've ever said on this issue. And it's not crap. Crap is the nonsense you believe. There is no science to support the HIV theory of AIDS and those who originally started it have retracted somewhat on the issue. There is no science to t-cell counting and viral load, nor any valid controlled studies that show that the meds help anyone.

With all the time, technology, money and resources put into HIV/AIDS research to date, and they haven't found a cure, perhaps the cure is not a drug. What makes you so sure it is?

If you're really concerned about how David Pasquarelli feels, ask him yourself. You'll be seeing him a lot before I will. But keep on laughing. Just remember, he who lasts laughs last. Personally, I don't think it's that funny. I've been having these same arguments on line for decades, and I keep winning, but by default. Hard to collect bets from dead people.

Why do I do this?

2005-12-03T04:02:00.000-08:00

For several years now I've been hanging out in m4m aol chatrooms to reach gay men who are newly diagnosed or about to get tested. In the 5 years that I had an aol website up, I received over 100,000 hits and helped save hundreds of lives, until AOL deleted my site. I get a lot of static from it, especially in the HIV chatrooms. Here is an IM that I received recently and my reply:

AnitaShlg [1:15 AM]: why do you insist on causing trouble when meds are keeping so many of us alive? Dear Anita, HIV meds have never kept anyone alive. They are killing people slower than they used to because they are less toxic then earlier formulations and they are being given to people who aren't sick at the start. I had over 200 friends who believed as you do. They are all dead and buried or cremated now. Everyone who followed my advice did well. A couple were scared back to the doctors by well-meaning, but scared, people like you. They are dead now too. In all these years, can you tell me why there is not one properly controlled study to show that these drugs help anybody (except the people who market them?) They compare one drug to another or different combinations of drugs. Never do they have a branch of the study that includes people like me and the hundreds of thousands who have been "HIV-positive" for at least 20 years but have never sought treatment for their "condition." There is no reason to even believe that these drugs are beneficial. They are, for the most part, chemotherapy drugs that kill cells and are highly immunosuppressive. Why would want to take immunosuppressive treatments when they are already thought to be immunosuppressed? They are all based on the failed "HIV theory" of AIDS. They destroy the bone marrow, the thymus, the liver and a lot of other vital parts of the body. They in no way create health, although initially, because of their high toxicity, they kill off all sorts of parasitic and fungal infections and may temporarily alleviate some symptoms. Their effectiveness is measured by invalid surrogate markers. My information may cause trouble for people who are insecure in their beliefs, but it saves lives of intelligent people who want to be able to make truly informed decisions. To my way of thinking people who are against the free flow of information, people who want to censor what others may see, are causing all the trouble. E

reply to Bootd's comment

2005-10-01T16:14:00.000-07:00

To bootd's comments:

EJ was examined by 3 qualified medical doctors, none of whom saw any evidence of pneumonia. She did not have any history of immune deficiency, a hallmark of "AIDS." The coroner was probably ordered by the CDC to declare this an "AIDS" death. Why did it take months to release the autopsy findings, which are currently being investigated? How can anyone know if the child was "HIV-positive," when testing blood after death can cause false positives in a test that is not reliable in the first place? It is much more likely that powerful antibiotics, and other medications given to a child who never had any toxic medications in her 3 year old body, was the cause of death.

Viral load does not measure "HIV," despite what you've been told or believe, and t-cells are not a valid surrogate marker for health or disease progression in "AIDS." An "HIV-negative" taking the same drugs would experience a rise in t-cell numbers too (until the drugs destroy the thymus and the bone marrow, at which point the victim will be told his virus is now resistant.) And plenty of "AIDS" victims are dying with "undetectable" viral loads.

Yes, there are people diagnosed "HIV-positive" who remain healthy with no medical intervention, but it has more to do with intelligence than luck -- unless you want to say we're lucky that we're intelligent. These people have examined the evidence with scientific scrutiny and logic and do not believe in viral theory of "AIDS." I've seen it in case after case without exception. Those who believe in and fear the virus, even if they shun the medical treatments, inevitably fail. Those who see through the nonsense enjoy good health, or, as you say in "AIDSspeak," "do not progress."

I'd like to ask you a question: Since the doctor who discovered the virus never claimed it caused "AIDS" and admitted he didn't believe it could, and the doctor who stole the virus from him and theorized that it killed t-cells, later admitted he was wrong; the virus doesn't kill t-cells, how come you still believe that it does?

The entire medical community is in error. And it's not just "AIDS," but most of modern medicine, which is why they work so hard and play so dirty to hide the truth. If the truth were commonly known and accepted, I think we'd see an epidemic of people shooting doctors and probably an epidemic of suicides within the medical community.

A letter to the LA Times re: Christine Maggiore, a mother's denial

2005-09-27T10:15:00.000-07:00

Bravo to the LA Times for shedding some light, even if tainted, on the most underreported story of a generation -- the huge controversy in science: Is "HIV" the cause of "AIDS?" You need to fact check a little better. Apparently, we can't take government experts at their word. Not just pediatric, but total annual new cases of "AIDS" have been plummeting since the definition of "AIDS" stopped expanding on 1/1/93. CDC health education specialist Lampe's information is wrong. All of it. The total number of new US "AIDS" cases and totals in all subgroups, Blacks, Hispanic, women, children, gays, drug addicts, etc. have been on the decline for more than a decade. The "more than 40,000" Lampe refers to would have to be the number of people identified each year as "HIV-positive" and not new "AIDS" victims as she attests. If the information specialists are so gross misinformed, what can we expect from the public? To say we "are stuck" at this number implies that we wish it were more. But the truth is 20 years after we were told that over a million Americans were "infected" (and the virus was spreading like wild fire) we are just now crossing that million line. That certainly isn't my idea of an epidemic. But, what I'd like to know is, if the plummeting of pediatric "AIDS" is "one of the biggest public health and medical successes in the US," why haven't we been getting the good news? Why were there no headlines to announce that there were zero children diagnosed with "AIDS" in Los Angeles in 2003? Why does the average person still think the problem is getting worse and worse, when in actuality, it is dying out? If anyone is in denial it is the doctors and the "AIDS" establishment who fear losing face, losing control, and losing hundreds of billions of dollars by admitting their gross error. Only now, in an attempt to discredit the "contrarians," that the issue makes news, do the figures become public info and the spin doctors try to use it to their advantage. The federal health officials and "AIDS" experts who say that "HIV" unquestionably causes "AIDS" all have a vested interest in saying that. To say otherwise will destroy their careers, their income and ostracize them from their peers. But there are thousands of signatories to the Rethinking AIDS statement who believe otherwise, including many medical doctors and Nobel Prize winning scientists. Why were none of these doctors interviewed for this story? If, as Dr. Havens attests, the contrarian beliefs are "bogus baloney," why have the mainstream orthodoxy refused to open the subject to debate? On the one occasion that they agreed to do this, at a conference held by South African president, Thabo Mbeki, they later backed out of all debates and proposed studies and, instead, issued a decree. Talk about pseudoscience! Christine is villainized for breastfeeding her children, yet the World Health Organization recommends that "HIV-positive" mothers all over the world breastfeed exclusively for at least the first 6 months. Does it take the sad death of a beautiful child to do what intelligent, moral men and women have been unable to do for over 20 years and shed light on what may well be the greatest medical blunder in history? Anyone who doesn't believe that all the establishment doctors and all the government experts can be wrong, grossly underestimates the power of stupid people in large numbers. *I put "HIV" and "AIDS" in quotations marks to emphasize that everything we "know" about them is assumed and not proven. This is done in the style of the late Dr. William Holub who, in 1987, was among the first scientists to publicly scrutinize and contradict the virus theory of "AIDS." This was true then, and still is today.

Response to solarjerom & delaney

2005-05-26T00:05:00.000-07:00

This is a response to the comment on my previous post.

I am not about to write a book which would be required to dispute all of Martin Delaneys lies and disinformation. I will start at beginning and deconstruct the bullshit, but once it is evident that this isn't science I will not continue to waste my time on this. You can take it from me, or you can go through it item by item yourself until you get tired of reading fiction masked as fact. There are better things to with your time, believe me.

The fact that solarjerom & Delaney both use the term "denialist" is a giveaway that we are up against people who will denounce us, but never honestly address the issues we raise. We are "dissidents" in that we dissent from the common beliefs, but far from "denialists." It's the AIDS Orthodoxy that are in denial. They deny the simple facts there is no evidence in all of published science to support the "HIV" theory of "AIDS." They deny (or ignor) facts like Robert Gallo even admitted that the virus doesn't kill t-cells; T-cells are not a valid surrogate marker for health or disease progression; The testing has been shown to be completely invalid; and their treatments are killing people. They insist their treatments are helping people to live longer. Intelligent scientists should address us as "dissidents." Calling us "denialists" is demeaning name-calling and very unprofessional.

After making a bunch of unsupported, anecdotal statements, which, if they were true, would be very easy to substantiate, Delaney's evidence that "HIV is the driving force in AIDS" (and that the drugs are effective) is the dramatic reduction in the death toll. However, the dramatic reduction in deaths started BEFORE the introduction of the miracle cocktails, so, what then was the reason for this? Another good question would be why weren't we told the dealth toll and number of new cases was going down annually? Public perception is that it was worsening and worsening.

To understand why "AIDS" numbers started going down, one needs to understand why they rose so dramatically before the decline. Several times since the beginning of the epidemic, the number of new cases per year was less than the previous year. When this happened the CDC changed the definition of "AIDS," broadening it to make the numbers go up. The new definition that went in effect on January 1,1993 added some female-only diseases dramatically increasing the percentage of female "AIDS" victims, and, for the first time included people with no disease but a lower than average t-cell count, were considered to have "AIDS." This doubled the number of people with "AIDS" overnight. When you put healthy people into the mix you can expect them to live longer than people who are sick at the time of diagnosis. The truth is that no one is living longer or better than those of us who never touched the "HIV" medications, but doctors aren't looking at us.

Each of Delaney's points can be deconstructed, but it takes at least 2 or 3 paragraphs to deconstruct one of his. If you're not convinced his arguments are empty, comment on the particular point and it will be addressed.

My Introduction to the Dissidents

2005-03-29T03:52:00.000-08:00

When I attempted to share my discovery with the major AIDS organizations, and eventually the White House, to my surprise, no one wanted to know about it.. AmFAR never replied to me, GMHC wasn't interested, but sent me to ActUp. ActUp wasn't really interested either but referred me to their Treatment Activist Group, who showed no interest either, but told me about a group called HEAL (Heal Education AIDS Liaison) who might be.

Unlike the pretty white boys (and concerned women) of ActUp whose meetings reminded me of Nazi rallies, the group at HEAL was a lot less polished and a lot more ethnicly mixed. And unlike the ActUp rallies that filled the main hall, their meeting had a more clandestine feeling. They were very interested in my discovery, and I was very interested in them. What I saw were about 40 men and women of all colors and various states of health, but mostly healthy, who were sharing their experiences.

Some believed herbal therapies were responsible for their good health. Others credited various mushrooms or other home remedies, enemas, etc. for their ability to remain healthy with HIV. The common thread with all of them, however, was that they had fired their doctors and rejected the medical intervention. They were not only interested in my immune-boosting exercise, but also in something else I had just found.

After learning that I was HIV-positive and believing my discovery, which was (and still is) a common thread in all the holistic clinics throughout the world which were successfully curing cancer, I wanted to find people, other than my handful of friends, who might have also used this technique successfully with HIV/AIDS. I put a little advertisement on the back page of the Village Voice. I could only afford to run it for a couple of weeks and didn't get the response I was looking for.

I got only one response to the ad and it wasn't from someone who had used this technique to cure HIV/AIDS. It was a report by a couple of microbiologists (a professor at a local community college and his wife) who had done no original research, but merely evaluated everything that been published on the subject during the first seven years of the epidemic WITH SCIENTIFIC SCRUTINY, and came to the conclusion that this was not an infectious, fatal syndrome caused by a virus and spread through sex and needle sharing, as we were being told, but a multifactorial lifestyle disease that was fully reversible.

Then I learned that there were many people, highly intelligent and respected in their fields, which included medicine, the sciences, law, religion, the humanities, education and journalism, who questioned the viral theory of AIDS, and that these people were frequently being silenced and shunned. These are the AIDS dissidents, and I found myself to be one them.